Tag: Health Policy

  • Why Pharmacy Funding Is a GP Issue Too

    Why Pharmacy Funding Is a GP Issue Too

    Anita Muñoz On the Guild, Pricing and Prescribing

    Dr Anita Muñoz joins Healthed’s Clinical Takeaway podcast to unpack one of general practice’s most under-examined cost pressures: how community pharmacy is funded, priced and regulated in Australia — and why GPs have a stake in fixing it. It’s a timely example of the policy depth she’d bring to the role.

    In conversation with Mia Jessurun, Associate at the Grattan Institute, Anita explores the findings of the Institute’s report Future Pharmacy: A Better Deal for Patients and Taxpayers. The episode looks past the headlines about pharmacist scope expansion to ask a more fundamental question:

    Who actually benefits from the current system, and at what cost to patients and taxpayers?

    What the Episode Covers

    The conversation traces the opacity of current community pharmacy agreements, and canvasses proposals to end existing funding deals, shift pricing to the Independent Hospital and Aged Care Pricing Authority (IHACPA), and remove ownership and location rules that limit competition in the sector. It also examines how dispensing fees and add-on charges flow through to PBS medicine costs for patients.

    For GPs, the episode’s most practically relevant thread is its look at embedded, non-dispensing pharmacists working within general practice and Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations, and the evidence for how integrated, multidisciplinary models like this can improve patient outcomes without the equity trade-offs of expanded pharmacist prescribing.

    Why This Matters for General Practice

    Pharmacy funding reform is usually framed as a pharmacy issue. Anita’s conversation makes the case that it isn’t. It shapes medicine affordability for patients, the future shape of multidisciplinary care in general practice, and the broader credibility of primary care policy debate.

    Understanding how the system actually works, rather than how it’s commonly described, is a first step toward GPs having a stronger voice in how it’s reformed.

    Listen to the Episode

    Future Pharmacy: What GPs Need to Know About Guild Power, Pricing and Prescribing is available now on Healthed, running 46 minutes and eligible for CPD hours across Educational Activities, Reviewing Performance and Measuring Outcomes categories.

    Listen on Healthed →

  • Protecting GP-Led Care Starts With Respect

    Protecting GP-Led Care Starts With Respect

    A Practical Plan to Strengthen GP-Led Care

    General practice is the foundation of Australia’s healthcare system, yet too often the value of a GP is overlooked in funding decisions, public discussion and health reform.

    If elected RACGP President, my first priority will be protecting GP-led care through respect and recognition.

    That means:

    • advocating for fairer funding
    • recognising the unique value of expert generalism
    • supporting International Medical Graduates and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander doctors
    • ensuring future reforms strengthen rather than diminish the role of general practice.

    I’ve published my first Vision to Action page, outlining the practical actions I will pursue to deliver this priority.

    Whether you’re interested in the overall vision or the detailed policy approach, I hope you’ll take a few minutes to explore it.

    Together, we can ensure general practice remains respected, valued and at the centre of patient care.

  • Good News for General Practice

    Good News for General Practice

    Yesterday the Federal Government announced important concessions to the proposed Assignment of Benefits (AOB) changes due to commence on 1 July.

    Following extensive advocacy and collaboration between the RACGP and the Department of Health, a number of practical concerns raised by GPs have been recognised.

    What Has Changed?

    • A 12-month grace period for implementation.
    • Continued use of verbal patient consent during the transition period.
    • Earlier implementation of enduring consent arrangements for eligible patients.
    • An educative rather than punitive approach to compliance.

    These concessions will help reduce unintended consequences for patients and practices while allowing more time to implement the changes safely and effectively.

    Importantly, the outcome demonstrates the value of constructive engagement between government, the profession and frontline clinicians. When policy development is informed by practical experience, better outcomes can be achieved for both patients and healthcare providers.

    This is a positive step forward for general practice and a reminder that advocacy can make a difference.

    Find more detailed information on these changes at RACGP Changes to the assignment of benefit process.

    Watch Anita’s short video update below

VOTING IS NOW OPEN

RACGP members, check your email for your official voting link and cast your vote